International Journal of Social Science Archives (IJSSA) https://ijssa.com/index.php/ijssa <h1 style="text-align: center;"><a title="HEC HJRS" href="https://hjrs.hec.gov.pk/index.php?r=site%2Fresult&amp;id=1088972#journal_result"><strong><img src="/public/site/images/admin/Y_Category1.jpg" width="769" height="154"></strong></a></h1> <p style="text-align: center;"><strong>HJRS Link: </strong><a href="https://hjrs.hec.gov.pk/index.php?r=site%2Fresult&amp;id=1088972#journal_result">https://hjrs.hec.gov.pk/index.php?r=site%2Fresult&amp;id=1088972#journal_result</a></p> <p>International Journal of Social Science Archives is an international peer-reviewed bi annual academic research journal, which provides the best platform for researchers and scholars all over the world to share the latest findings. Authors are encouraged to submit complete, unpublished, original and innovative works in all social science fields. The journal focuses on, but not limited to the following topics: sociology, political science, education, linguistics, tertiary education, economics, psychology, peace and conflict studies, management science, law, social work and related disciplines. Authors are encouraged to submit your papers through Open Journal System (OJS) or send your submissions to us via this email <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">managingeditor@ijssa.com</span></strong>&nbsp;directly according to the submission guidelines.<br><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">ISSN: 2707-8892</span></strong></p> en-US <p>Copyright Notice Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication. Copyrights for articles published in IJSSA journal are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author’s responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.</p> editor@ijssa.com (Dr. Zain Ullah) editor@ijssa.com (Mr. Mubashir Ahmad) Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000 OJS 3.1.2.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 The Effect of Social Media Campaigns and Issue Salience with Moderating Role of Online Network Diversity https://ijssa.com/index.php/ijssa/article/view/663 <p>Social media campaigns have transformed the dynamics of communication, enabling rapid dissemination of information and mobilization of public opinion. This study examines the effect of social media campaigns on issue salience, with a particular focus on the moderating role of online network diversity. Social media campaigns are defined as organized digital communication efforts aimed at raising awareness and influencing public perception, while issue salience refers to the degree to which a particular issue is perceived as important by the public. Drawing upon agenda setting theory and network theory, this study proposes that social media campaigns significantly influence issue salience by amplifying messages, shaping narratives, and increasing visibility. Hashtag activism and digital campaigns provide platforms for marginalized voices and facilitate public discourse, thereby elevating the prominence of social and political issues. Additionally, research suggests that high salience issues are more persuasive and attract greater engagement in campaigns. Online network diversity, defined as the extent to which individuals are exposed to diverse viewpoints within their digital networks, is hypothesized to moderate this relationship. Diverse networks reduce echo chambers and enhance exposure to varied perspectives, thereby influencing how issues gain salience. A quantitative research design was employed using survey data collected from 330 respondents. Smart PLS was used to analyze the structural relationships among variables. The findings reveal that social media campaigns significantly enhance issue salience, and online network diversity strengthens this relationship. Individuals exposed to diverse networks are more likely to perceive issues as important due to increased information variety and reduced bias. The study contributes to the literature by integrating communication, network, and behavioral perspectives. It highlights the importance of designing inclusive and diverse online environments to maximize the impact of social media campaigns. The findings provide practical implications for policymakers, marketers, and activists seeking to influence public opinion and drive social change.</p> Akash Khan Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Science Archives (IJSSA) https://ijssa.com/index.php/ijssa/article/view/663 Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:15:42 +0000 Electoral Systems, Political Efficacy and Voter Turnout: Moderating Role of Socioeconomic Status https://ijssa.com/index.php/ijssa/article/view/664 <p>Electoral participation is a cornerstone of democratic governance, and voter turnout is widely regarded as a key indicator of political engagement and legitimacy. This study examines the relationship between electoral systems, political efficacy, and voter turnout, with a particular focus on the moderating role of socioeconomic status. Electoral systems shape how votes are translated into political representation, influencing citizens’ perceptions of fairness and effectiveness. Research indicates that proportional representation systems tend to enhance voter turnout by increasing citizens’ belief that their votes matter, thereby strengthening political efficacy. Conversely, majoritarian systems may discourage participation among minority groups due to perceived vote wastage. Political efficacy, defined as individuals’ belief in their ability to influence political processes, is a critical determinant of voting behavior. Empirical evidence suggests that both internal and external political efficacy significantly influence voter turnout, as individuals are more likely to vote when they perceive the political system as responsive and meaningful. However, the impact of electoral systems and political efficacy on turnout is not uniform across populations. Socioeconomic status plays a moderating role in this relationship. Higher levels of education and income are associated with increased political participation, while disadvantaged groups often exhibit lower turnout rates. Socioeconomic inequalities can amplify or weaken the effects of electoral systems and political efficacy, leading to disparities in democratic participation. This study employs a quantitative research design using survey data collected from 360 respondents. Structural Equation Modeling using Smart PLS is applied to test the hypothesized relationships. The findings reveal that electoral systems significantly influence political efficacy and voter turnout, while political efficacy partially mediates this relationship. Additionally, socioeconomic status moderates the relationship between political efficacy and voter turnout, highlighting the importance of addressing inequality in democratic processes.</p> Sami Ullah Khan Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Science Archives (IJSSA) https://ijssa.com/index.php/ijssa/article/view/664 Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:17:28 +0000 Stress and Academic Performance Among Students: Mediating Role of Coping Strategies https://ijssa.com/index.php/ijssa/article/view/665 <p>Academic stress has emerged as a critical concern in higher education, influencing students’ psychological well being and academic outcomes. This study investigates the relationship between stress and academic performance among students, with a specific focus on the mediating role of coping strategies. Drawing upon the transactional theory of stress and coping, the study explores how different forms of stress affect students’ academic achievement and how coping mechanisms intervene in this relationship. A quantitative research design was adopted using survey data collected from university students. Structural Equation Modeling was employed to test the hypothesized relationships. The findings reveal that academic stress has a significant negative effect on students’ academic performance. However, coping strategies such as problem focused coping and emotion focused coping partially mediate this relationship, reducing the adverse effects of stress. Students who utilize adaptive coping strategies demonstrate better academic outcomes compared to those relying on avoidance strategies. These results are consistent with prior empirical findings that highlight the importance of coping mechanisms in managing stress effectively. The study contributes to the existing literature by providing empirical evidence on the mediating role of coping strategies, particularly in the context of developing countries. It emphasizes the need for educational institutions to incorporate stress management programs and promote adaptive coping skills among students. The implications of this research extend to policymakers, educators, and mental health professionals aiming to enhance student performance and wellbeing.</p> Hazrat Hussain Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Science Archives (IJSSA) https://ijssa.com/index.php/ijssa/article/view/665 Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:19:00 +0000 The Effect of Civil Society Participation, Advocacy Effectiveness, and Governance Outcomes on Political Environment https://ijssa.com/index.php/ijssa/article/view/666 <p>Civil society plays a central role in shaping political environments by promoting accountability, transparency, and citizen participation. This study examines the effect of civil society participation, advocacy effectiveness, and governance outcomes on the political environment. Civil society participation refers to the engagement of non-state actors in public decision-making processes, while advocacy effectiveness reflects the ability of these actors to influence policy outcomes. Governance outcomes encompass institutional performance indicators such as accountability, rule of law, and transparency. The political environment is conceptualized as the overall condition of political stability, openness, and responsiveness within a state. Drawing upon participatory governance theory and democratic accountability theory, this study proposes that civil society participation positively influences governance outcomes and advocacy effectiveness, which in turn shape the political environment. Effective civil society engagement enhances transparency, representation, and legitimacy in governance systems. Moreover, advocacy initiatives contribute to policy reforms and improved governance practices by amplifying citizen voices and holding authorities accountable.&nbsp; A quantitative research design was employed using survey data from 340 respondents. Smart PLS was used to analyze the structural relationships among variables. The findings reveal that civil society participation significantly improves governance outcomes and advocacy effectiveness, both of which positively influence the political environment. Additionally, governance outcomes mediate the relationship between civil society participation and political environment. The study contributes to the literature by integrating civil society dynamics with governance and political environment outcomes. It highlights the importance of strengthening civil society institutions and advocacy mechanisms to foster democratic and stable political environments. Policymakers are encouraged to create enabling civic spaces that support citizen engagement and institutional accountability</p> Jamal Khan Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Science Archives (IJSSA) https://ijssa.com/index.php/ijssa/article/view/666 Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:20:42 +0000 Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity: Policy Readiness and Institutional Challenges in Pakistan https://ijssa.com/index.php/ijssa/article/view/667 <p>The rapid expansion of digital technologies in Pakistan has significantly increased exposure to cyber threats, particularly as government services, financial systems, and private sector operations become increasingly digitized. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool for enhancing cybersecurity through real-time threat detection, predictive analytics, and automated response mechanisms. However, the effective deployment of AI-driven cybersecurity systems requires robust institutional frameworks, regulatory oversight, and technical capacity. This study examines Pakistan’s policy readiness for integrating AI into cybersecurity, focusing on institutional challenges, governance gaps, and implementation barriers. Using a policy analysis approach supported by secondary data and institutional assessment, the study evaluates national cybersecurity strategies, technological capabilities, and capacity constraints. The findings highlight the need for coordinated governance, workforce development, regulatory strengthening, and strategic investment to build resilient cyber defense systems. The study provides policy recommendations for enhancing national cybersecurity readiness and offers insights relevant to other developing countries undergoing digital transformation.</p> Nisar Azhar Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Science Archives (IJSSA) https://ijssa.com/index.php/ijssa/article/view/667 Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:22:26 +0000